If you follow education in Japan, you have surely come across the name gakushū shidō yōryō — the national Courses of Study. Teachers know it, and parents hear it in the news. It is the deepest root document of Japanese schooling: textbooks are based on it, timetables are based on it, and even the assessment categories on report cards trace back to it. And yet surprisingly few people have ever opened the actual text. Open it cold and you meet a wall of headings and numbered clauses, and it is easy to close the tab and give up.

Here is the thing, though: the Courses of Study are public documents that anyone can read — once you have a map of their structure and the right pair of glasses to read them with. In this article I walk through the current standards (promulgated in 2017–2018): their overall structure, the difference between the official text and the explanatory guides, and the key that unlocks every subject's goals — the "three pillars of competencies." Everything is based solely on primary sources from MEXT (Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) and the Central Council for Education. I wrote it for teachers planning tomorrow's unit, and for parents who want a clearer window into school.

1. What the Courses of Study Are — a National Curriculum Standard

MEXT describes the Courses of Study as the national standards for the school curriculum, set "so that a certain level of education can be maintained at any school anywhere in the country." For elementary, junior high, and high school, they lay out the goals and the broad content of each subject. The textbooks children use and the timetables schools run are built on this foundation.

One more property matters: the standards are revised roughly once every ten years. As society changes, the very definition of "what and how children learn at school" gets a periodic overhaul. That revision cycle is exactly why it pays to know which version is currently in force — and when the next one is coming.

A word on "kokuji" (promulgation): MEXT's materials refer to the current standards as "promulgated in 2017 (Heisei 29)" or "2018 (Heisei 30)." Kokuji is the formal act by which the state gives public notice of a standard, and the printed editions sold in bookstores carry that year on the cover. The year label is how you tell versions apart — a handy thing to remember.

2. Which Version Is in Use Right Now?

The standards used in schools today are the ones promulgated in 2017 (Heisei 29) for elementary and junior high schools, and in 2018 (Heisei 30) for high schools (the kindergarten curriculum was revised in 2017, and the special-needs school standards in 2017 and 2019). The direction of the revision was set by the Central Council for Education's report of December 21, 2016 (Report No. 197).

According to MEXT's explanatory materials, classroom practice switched over to these standards in the 2020 school year for elementary schools (full implementation), the 2021 school year for junior high schools (full implementation), and from the 2022 school year for high schools, phased in one grade at a time. In other words, as of 2026, every student from first grade through high school is learning under the "2017–2018 promulgation." MEXT promotes this revision under the slogan "a zest for life — toward what lies beyond learning" (ikiru chikara).

Council report Dec 2016 Promulgated 2017 / 2018 Full implementation Elem. 2020 / JHS 2021 HS 2022, phased in Next revision: remit Dec 25, 2024 Issues paper Sep 25, 2025 Report (planned) within FY2026 Current (2017–2018) = today's schools Next (under deliberation) Revised on a roughly ten-year cycle
The current Courses of Study and the deliberations toward the next revision (compiled from MEXT and Central Council for Education materials)

3. The Map: Preamble, General Provisions, Subjects

Now for the contents. The text of the Courses of Study has three layers: the preamble, the general provisions, and the subject chapters. Keep this map in your head and it is much harder to get lost.

  • The preamble — an introduction stating what the whole document aims for. This is where you find "a curriculum open to society" (shakai ni hirakareta kyōiku katei): the idea that school education should not be closed inside the school but shared with, and realized together with, society. It is the signature concept of the current revision.
  • The general provisions (sōsoku) — the blueprint for the school's curriculum as a whole. Curriculum organization, lesson improvement (the "proactive, interactive, and deep learning" we will meet below), support for each student's development, school management — the cross-subject common rules all live here.
  • The subject chapters — Japanese, social studies, arithmetic/mathematics, and so on, plus chapters for moral education as a special subject (elementary and junior high), foreign-language activities (elementary), the period for integrated (inquiry-based) study, and special activities. Each subject chapter follows the same template: "Part 1: Goals," "Part 2: Goals and Content for Each Grade," and "Part 3: Lesson Planning and Handling of the Content."
Courses of Study (official text) Preamble — "a curriculum open to society" General provisions — cross-subject rules Subjects (Japanese, math, …) 1. Goals — (1)(2)(3) = the three pillars 2. Goals and content for each grade 3. Lesson planning & handling of content Guides Explanatory volumes by MEXT, per subject Intent & examples Start reading here
A map of the structure of the Courses of Study (based on the elementary-school Course of Study, 2017 promulgation)

Grade groupings differ by subject: in "Part 2: Goals and Content for Each Grade," some subjects — arithmetic, science — state goals and content grade by grade, while others — Japanese, music, arts and crafts — group them two grades at a time ("Grades 1 and 2," and so on). If you cannot find the grade you are looking for, check the grouping unit first.

4. The Text vs. the Guides — Which Should You Open First?

Search for the Courses of Study online and you will meet two confusingly similar kinds of documents: the "Course of Study" itself and the "Course of Study Guides" (kaisetsu, explanatory commentaries). Knowing how these two relate is the first fork in the road.

 Text (promulgated)Guides (kaisetsu)
NatureThe national standard itself, given public notice by the stateExplanatory volumes MEXT produces per subject to explain the text's intent and content
StyleTerse, list-like; one subject's portion is surprisingly shortSentence-by-sentence background, intent, and concrete examples
Best used forChecking the skeleton and the exact wordingReading through to understand why it is written that way

Both are published as free PDFs on MEXT's website — anyone can read them. My recommended entry point is simple: start with the Guide for the subject and grade that concerns you. Reading the bare text first tends to feel too terse to grasp the intent; the Guides quote the text as they go and explain it patiently, so you end up learning how to read the text as a by-product.

Point: the text is the map's "symbols"; the Guides are the "legend and route notes." Just checking which of the two your search landed you on will do a lot to dissolve the impression that the Courses of Study are impenetrable.

5. The Glasses: the Three Pillars of Competencies

After the map, the glasses. The current Courses of Study organize the competencies education should develop into three pillars: "knowledge and skills," "abilities to think, make judgments, and express oneself," and "motivation to learn and humanity." This framework comes from the Central Council for Education's 2016 report and forms the backbone of the current revision.

Why does this matter for reading? Because every subject's goals are written in the order of the three pillars. Open any subject's "Part 1: Goals" and you find a preamble sentence stating the subject's overall direction, followed by items (1), (2), and (3). Item (1) corresponds to "knowledge and skills," (2) to "thinking, judgment, and expression," and (3) to "motivation to learn and humanity." Once you know this correspondence, you can read the goals of any subject, at any grade, through the same glasses. In Japanese (the subject) and some others, even the content in "Part 2" is organized under the bracketed headings 〔knowledge and skills〕 and 〔thinking, judgment, and expression〕. The numbers and brackets are not decoration — they are the design philosophy of the three pillars showing through.

Two more keywords are worth keeping at hand. One is "proactive, interactive, and deep learning" (shutaiteki, taiwateki de fukai manabi). This is not the name of a new teaching method; the general provisions position it as a perspective for lesson improvement — looking at lessons from the side of the children's learning. The other is "curriculum management": designing the curriculum across subject boundaries, then evaluating and improving how it is carried out, from the school-management side. Together with the preamble's "curriculum open to society," these three terms are the shared vocabulary for reading the current standards.

For parents: the reason report cards now assess three categories — "knowledge and skills," "thinking, judgment, and expression," and "attitude of engaging proactively with learning" — is precisely this three-pillar framework. The (1)(2)(3) in the goals and the three assessment categories on the report card come from the same blueprint.

6. In Practice: a 4-Step Reading Routine for Teachers

Folding the map and the glasses into a unit-planning routine gives you this:

  1. Enter through the Guide for your subject and grade — do not start by reading the text from page one. The relevant section of the Guide quotes the text while explaining intent and examples, so it is the shortest path to understanding the background of a unit.
  2. Read the goals' (1)(2)(3) through the three pillars — turn the subject and grade goals into the question, "Which pillar carries the weight in this unit?" You can also see from here how the three assessment categories will map on.
  3. Read "Content" and "Handling of the Content" as a set — build lessons from "Part 2" alone and you risk missing the stipulations and priorities placed in "Part 3." Always shuttle between the content item and its corresponding handling notes.
  4. Return to the general provisions — moral education, special-needs support, cross-curricular competencies such as language ability and information literacy, curriculum management: the horizontal rules that no subject chapter shows you are in the general provisions. When you connect a unit to annual plans or whole-school initiatives, this is the authority to cite.

One more thing: once you experience for yourself that every subject chapter follows the same template, you become able to read the standards of subjects outside your specialty. That pays off in cross-curricular units and in coordination between homeroom and specialist teachers.

7. Three Ways Parents Can Use It

The Courses of Study are not a document for teachers only. They are published as a national standard — and given the ideal of "a curriculum open to society," being read by parents is arguably part of the design. Three concrete uses:

  • Decoding the report card — as noted above, the three assessment categories correspond to the three pillars. What the category "attitude of engaging proactively with learning" is actually looking for becomes concrete once you trace it back to the standards and the Guides.
  • Answering "Why do I have to learn this?" — the classic dinner-table question. The preamble sentence of each subject's goals compresses the reason that subject exists into a few lines. It is the most authoritative source for the "point" of a subject that a textbook alone will not tell you.
  • Raising the resolution of open-lesson days and conferences — skim your child's grade-level goals and content before visiting a class, and the intent behind the teacher's moves becomes much easier to see. It also gives you shared ground for talking about learning at parent–teacher conferences.

8. The Next Revision Is Being Deliberated Right Now

Finally, back to that "roughly every ten years" cycle — where are we now? Deliberations toward the next Courses of Study have already begun. On December 25, 2024, the Minister of Education issued a formal remit to the Central Council for Education, "On the Standards of the Curriculum in Primary and Secondary Education." Among the items to be examined are curriculum standards that realize deep, high-quality learning while being clearer and easier to use, and a flexible curriculum that includes and supports diverse children.

The Council's Special Committee on Curriculum Planning then published an "issues paper" (ronten seiri) on September 25, 2025, laying out the overall direction of the revision. According to MEXT materials, the Council's final report is planned within fiscal 2026. In other words, 2026 — as I write this — is the threshold year, waiting on the report.

What exactly is set to change? I am planning a separate series — a "next Courses of Study watch" — that follows the issues paper and the deliberations as they progress. If you get the current standards' reading method down first, the news about the next revision becomes readable as "what changes, where."

9. Summary

The Courses of Study are Japan's national curriculum standards, set by MEXT so that schooling maintains a certain level anywhere in the country, and revised roughly every ten years. The current version was promulgated in 2017–2018 and fully implemented from 2020 (elementary), 2021 (junior high), and phased in from 2022 (high school).

The text has three layers — preamble, general provisions, subject chapters — and every subject chapter uses the same template: goals / goals and content for each grade / lesson planning and handling of the content.

Start reading with the Guide for the subject and grade that concerns you. The text is the standard itself; the Guides are MEXT's explanatory companions.

The goals' items (1)(2)(3) correspond to the three pillars of competencies, which also connect to the three report-card assessment categories. With these glasses, every subject and grade reads the same way.

The next revision is under deliberation, with the Council's report planned within fiscal 2026. Knowing how to read the current standards is the foundation for understanding the next ones.

One last note: the reading routine introduced here is one way of doing it. Depending on your school and subject, there may be better entry points and uses. "In my subject we read it this way," "here is how I used it as a parent" — if you have thoughts or ideas, I would love to hear them via the contact form (the article name is filled in automatically).

Free Classroom Materials

Once you have read the standards, try our free printable worksheets and learning games, organized by unit.

Browse the worksheets →

Main Sources (all primary)

  • MEXT, "Courses of Study — a zest for life: toward what lies beyond learning" (mext.go.jp, in Japanese)
  • MEXT, "What are the Courses of Study?" — special page for parents (mext.go.jp, in Japanese)
  • MEXT, "Courses of Study revised in 2017–2019 (texts and guides)" (mext.go.jp, in Japanese; provisional English translations are also hosted there)
  • Central Council for Education, Report No. 197, "On the Improvement of the Courses of Study for Kindergarten, Elementary, Junior High, and High Schools and Schools for Special Needs Education" (December 21, 2016) (mext.go.jp, in Japanese)
  • MEXT Curriculum Division, "Full Implementation of the New Courses of Study and the Improvement of Learning Assessment" (FY2019 briefing materials) (PDF, in Japanese)
  • Central Council for Education remit, "On the Standards of the Curriculum in Primary and Secondary Education" — key points, detailed version (remit of December 25, 2024) (PDF, in Japanese)
  • Central Council for Education, Special Committee on Curriculum Planning, "Issues Paper" — key points, detailed version (September 25, 2025) (PDF, in Japanese)

※ Promulgation years, implementation years, and deliberation dates in this article follow the MEXT and Central Council for Education materials above (verified July 31, 2026). Japanese term romanizations are the author's.